Getting down to basics: a situated model of conflict in social relations

Peter T. Coleman , Katharina G. Kugler , Lan Bui-Wrzosińska , Andrzej Nowak , Robin R. Vallacher


The field of conflict resolution is fractured. Despite many decades of fine research, we still lack a basic unifying framework that integrates the many theories of conflict dynamics. Thus, the findings from research on conflict are often piecemeal, decontextualized, contradictory, or focused on negative outcomes, which contributes to a persistent research-practice gap. In this article, we describe a situated model for the study of conflict that combines separate strands of scholarship into a coherent framework for conceptualizing conflict in dyadic social relations. The model considers conflict interactions in the context of social relations and employs prior research on the fundamental dimensions of social relations to create a basic framework for investigating conflict dynamics. The resulting model is heuristic and generative.We discuss the theoretical context and main propositions of this model as well as its implications for conflict resolution practitioners.
Author Peter T. Coleman
Peter T. Coleman,,
, Katharina G. Kugler
Katharina G. Kugler,,
, Lan Bui-Wrzosińska (Wydział Psychologii)
Lan Bui-Wrzosińska,,
- Wydział Psychologii
, Andrzej Nowak (Wydział Psychologii)
Andrzej Nowak,,
- Wydział Psychologii
, Robin R. Vallacher
Robin R. Vallacher,,
Journal seriesNegotiation Journal, ISSN 0748-4526, (A 20 pkt)
Issue year2012
Vol28 (1)
Publication size in sheets0
Keywords in Englishconflict, conflict theory, power, interdependence, social relations, negotiation, adaptivity, stimulus fields
ASJC Classification1405 Management of Technology and Innovation; 1408 Strategy and Management; 3300 General Social Sciences
Languageen angielski
nejo-324.pdf of 14-09-2015
272.9 KB
getting-negotiation-journal-2012.pdf of 14-09-2015
270.51 KB
Score (nominal)20
Publication indicators Scopus SNIP (Source Normalised Impact per Paper): 2012 = 0.665; WoS Impact Factor: 2012 = 0.234 (2) - 2012=0.459 (5)
Citation count*
Additional fields
Dorobek Naukowy - Preview URL
Dorobek Naukowy - Approve URL
Dorobek Naukowy - Preview URL
Dorobek Naukowy - Approve URL
Share Share

Get link to the record

* presented citation count is obtained through Internet information analysis and it is close to the number calculated by the Publish or Perish system.
Are you sure?