Nencki Affective Word List (NAWL): the cultural adaptation of the Berlin Affective Word List--Reloaded (BAWL-R) for Polish
Monika Riegel , Małgorzata Wierzba , Marek Wypych , Łukasz Zurawski , Katarzyna Jednoróg , Anna Grabowska , Artur Marchewka
Abstract
In the present article, we introduce the Nencki Affective Word List (NAWL), created in order to provide researchers with a database of 2,902 Polish words, including nouns, verbs, and adjectives, with ratings of emotional valence, arousal, and imageability. Measures of several objective psycholinguistic features of the words (frequency, grammatical class, and number of letters) are also controlled. The database is a Polish adaptation of the Berlin Affective Word List--Reloaded (BAWL-R; Võ et al., Behavior Research Methods 41:534--538, 2009), commonly used to investigate the affective properties of German words. Affective normative ratings were collected from 266 Polish participants (136 women and 130 men). The emotional ratings and psycholinguistic indexes provided by NAWL can be used by researchers to better control the verbal materials they apply and to adjust them to specific experimental questions or issues of interest. The NAWL is freely accessible to the scientific community for noncommercial use as supplementary material to this article.Author | |||||||||
Journal series | Behavior Research Methods, ISSN 1554-351X, (A 45 pkt) | ||||||||
Issue year | 2015 | ||||||||
Vol | 47 | ||||||||
No | 4 | ||||||||
Pages | 1222-1236 | ||||||||
Publication size in sheets | 0.7 | ||||||||
Keywords in English | Emotion, Affective verbal stimuli, Affective ratings, Valence, Arousal, Imageability, Berlin affective word list–reloaded, Nencki affective word list | ||||||||
ASJC Classification | ; ; ; ; | ||||||||
DOI | DOI:10.3758/s13428-014-0552-1 | ||||||||
URL | http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-014-0552-1 | ||||||||
Language | en angielski | ||||||||
File | |||||||||
Additional file |
| ||||||||
Score (nominal) | 45 | ||||||||
Publication indicators | : 2015 = 2.23; : 2015 = 3.048 (2) - 2015=3.979 (5) | ||||||||
Citation count* |
* presented citation count is obtained through Internet information analysis and it is close to the number calculated by the Publish or Perish system.
Back