In search of the optimal measure of awareness: Discrete or continuous?

Michał Wierzchoń , Anna Anzulewicz , Justyna Hobot , Borysław Paulewicz , Jerome Sackur

Abstract

Studies of perceptual awareness require sensitive measures reflecting subjective judgments of visibility. Two scales have been proposed for this purpose: the Continuous Scale (CS) and the Perceptual Awareness Scale (PAS). Here we compare the scales in the context of the Gabor patch orientation discrimination task and propose a Continuous Perceptual Awareness Scale (C-PAS) that aims to combine their advantages. The results of the study shown no differences in sensitivity between the scales. However, we observed differences between the scales in awareness ratings frequencies and accuracy associated with the lowest ratings. We concluded that visibility ratings are often biased, and thus, the scale sensitivity may not be optimal. Furthermore, based on the additional analyses, we argued that there is an advantage of using C-PAS over CS. The scale allows to use an additional variability of judgment within PAS categories and thus it may enable more fine-grained measurement of visibility at near-threshold conditions.
Author Michał Wierzchoń
Michał Wierzchoń,,
-
, Anna Anzulewicz
Anna Anzulewicz,,
-
, Justyna Hobot
Justyna Hobot,,
-
, Borysław Paulewicz (Wydział Psychologii w Katowicach)
Borysław Paulewicz,,
- Wydział Psychologii w Katowicach
, Jerome Sackur
Jerome Sackur,,
-
Journal seriesConsciousness and Cognition, ISSN 1053-8100, e-ISSN 1090-2376, (N/A 100 pkt)
Issue year2019
Vol75
Pages1-10
Publication size in sheets0.5
ASJC Classification1201 Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous); 3204 Developmental and Educational Psychology; 3205 Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
DOIDOI:10.1016/j.concog.2019.102798
Languageen angielski
File
In search of the optimal Paulewicz.pdf 508.51 KB
Oswiadczenie In search Paulewicz.pdf 36.36 KB
Score (nominal)100
Score sourcejournalList
Publication indicators Scopus SNIP (Source Normalised Impact per Paper): 2018 = 0.958; WoS Impact Factor: 2017 = 2.272 (2) - 2017=2.521 (5)
Citation count*
Cite
Share Share

Get link to the record


* presented citation count is obtained through Internet information analysis and it is close to the number calculated by the Publish or Perish system.
Back
Confirmation
Are you sure?