The Association Between Physical and Mental Health and Face Mask Use During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Comparison of Two Countries With Different Views and Practices

Cuiyan Wang , Agata Chudzicka-Czupała , Damian Grabowski , Riyu Pan , Katarzyna Adamus , Xiaoyang Wan , Mateusz Hetnał , Yilin Tan , Agnieszka Olszewska-Guizzo , Linkang Xu , Roger S. McIntyre , Jessica Quek , Roger Ho , Cyrus Ho

Abstract

Background: The physical and mental health of citizens living in a country that encouraged face masks (China) and discouraged face masks (Poland) during the initial stage of the COVID-19 pandemic remained unknown. We conducted a cross-country study to compare the psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Poles and Chinese. This study aimed to compare the levels of psychological impact of pandemic and levels of anxiety and depression between China and Poland. Methods: The survey collected information on demographic data, physical symptoms, contact history, and precautionary measures. The psychological impact was assessed using the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R), and mental health status was assessed by the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21). The chi-squared test was used to analyze the differences in categorical variables between the two populations. Linear regression was used to calculate the bivariate associations between independents variables (e.g., physical symptoms and precautionary measures) and dependent variables (e.g., mental health outcomes). Results: This study included a total of 2,266 respondents from both countries (1,056 Poles and 1,210 Chinese). There were significantly less Polish respondents who wore face masks (Poles: 35.0%; Chinese: 96.8% p < 0.001). Significantly more Polish respondents reported physical symptoms resembling COVID-19 infection (p < 0.001), recent medical consultation (p < 0.01), recent COVID-19 testing (p < 0.001), and hospitalization (p < 0.01). Furthermore, Polish respondents had significantly higher levels of anxiety, depression and stress (p < 0.001) than Chinese. The mean IES-R scores of Poland and China were above the cut-off for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms. Besides precautionary measures, unemployment, retirement, physical symptoms resembling COVID-19 infection, recent medical consultation or COVID-19 testing, and long daily duration of home confinement were risk factors for PTSD symptoms, anxiety, depression, or stress for Polish respondents. Conclusion: Use of face masks at the community level may safeguard better physical and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic. There is a need of health education with scientific information from Polish health authority on the proper use of face masks and reduce social stigma. This study was limited by the respondent sampling method that had compromised the representativeness of samples.
Publication categoriesDidactic article/chapter
Author Cuiyan Wang
Cuiyan Wang,,
-
, Agata Chudzicka-Czupała (Wydział Psychologii w Katowicach)
Agata Chudzicka-Czupała,,
- Wydział Psychologii w Katowicach
, Damian Grabowski (Wydział Psychologii w Katowicach)
Damian Grabowski,,
- Wydział Psychologii w Katowicach
, Riyu Pan
Riyu Pan,,
-
, Katarzyna Adamus
Katarzyna Adamus,,
-
, Xiaoyang Wan
Xiaoyang Wan,,
-
, Mateusz Hetnał
Mateusz Hetnał,,
-
, Yilin Tan
Yilin Tan,,
-
, Agnieszka Olszewska-Guizzo
Agnieszka Olszewska-Guizzo,,
-
, Linkang Xu
Linkang Xu,,
-
et al.`
Journal seriesFrontiers in Psychiatry, ISSN 1664-0640, (N/A 100 pkt)
Issue year2020
Vol11
Pages1-13
Publication size in sheets0.6
Keywords in EnglishAnxiety, COVID-19, Depression, Mask, Knowledge, Precaution, Psychological impact, Stress
ASJC Classification2738 Psychiatry and Mental health
DOIDOI:10.3389/fpsyt.2020.569981
Languageen angielski
File
the association between.pdf 645.58 KB
AgataChudzicka-Czupała =Oświadczenie_1_osiagniecia_naukowe.docx 86.27 KB
DamianGrabowski =Oświadczenie_1_osiagniecia_naukowe.docx 69.61 KB
Score (nominal)100
Score sourcejournalList
Publication indicators Scopus SNIP (Source Normalised Impact per Paper): 2018 = 0.991; WoS Impact Factor: 2018 = 3.161 (2)
Citation count*
Cite
Share Share

Get link to the record


* presented citation count is obtained through Internet information analysis and it is close to the number calculated by the Publish or Perish system.
Back
Confirmation
Are you sure?