Perceptual evaluation of synthetic gaze jitter

Krzysztof Krejtz , Andrew Duchowski , Heng Zhou , Sophie Jörg , Anna Niedzielska

Abstract

Eye movements are an essential part of non-verbal behavior. Non-player characters, as they occur in many games, communicate with the player through dialogue and non-verbal behavior and can have a strong influence on player experience or even on gameplay. In this paper, we evaluate a procedural model designed to synthesize the subtleties of eye motion. More specifically, our model adds microsaccadic jitter and pupil unrest both modeled by 1/fα or pink noise to the saccadic main sequence. In a series of perceptual two-alternative forced-choice experiments, we explore the perceived naturalness of different parameters of pink noise by comparing synthesized motions to rendered motion of recorded eye movements at extreme close shot and close shot distances. Our results show that, on average, animations based on a procedural model with pink noise were perceived and evaluated as highly natural, whereas data-driven motion without any jitter or with unfiltered jitter were consistently selected as the least natural in appearance.
Author Krzysztof Krejtz (Wydział Psychologii)
Krzysztof Krejtz,,
- Wydział Psychologii
, Andrew Duchowski
Andrew Duchowski,,
-
, Heng Zhou
Heng Zhou,,
-
, Sophie Jörg
Sophie Jörg,,
-
, Anna Niedzielska
Anna Niedzielska,,
-
Journal seriesComputer Animation and Virtual Worlds, ISSN 1546-4261, (A 15 pkt)
Issue year2018
Vol29
No1745
Pages1-20
Publication size in sheets0.3
Keywords in Englishcharacter animation, eye movements, gaze synthesis, microsaccades, pupil unrest
ASJC Classification1704 Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design; 1712 Software
DOIDOI:10.1002/cav.1745
URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cav.1745
Languageen angielski
File
Krejtz_et_al-2017-Computer_Animation_and_Virtual_Worlds.pdf 2.18 MB
Additional file
Oswiadczenie_k.Krejtz_ponowne_Perceptual evaluation of synthetic.pdf 88.25 KB
Score (nominal)15
Score sourcejournalList
Publication indicators Scopus SNIP (Source Normalised Impact per Paper): 2016 = 0.406; WoS Impact Factor: 2017 = 0.697 (2) - 2017=0.68 (5)
Citation count*
Cite
Share Share

Get link to the record


* presented citation count is obtained through Internet information analysis and it is close to the number calculated by the Publish or Perish system.
Back
Confirmation
Are you sure?