Inter-relations among negative social control, self-efficacy, and physical activity in healthy couples

Diana Hilda Hohl , Janina Lüscher , Jan Keller , Silke Heuse , Urte Scholz , Aleksandra Łuszczyńska , Nina Knoll

Abstract

Objectives. In romantic relationships, partners can influence each other’s healthrelevant behaviour by exerting negative social control (e.g., pressuring), however, with mixed success. To elucidate this phenomenon, we examined couples motivated to increase their physical activity and investigated the degree to which both partners exerted negative control on each other, their self-efficacy, reciprocal associations among the two behaviour-specific constructs, and their relationship with moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA). Design. This was a longitudinal study with three assessment periods (T0, T2, T3) spanning 7 weeks. Methods. We performed secondary analyses with data from the control condition (N = 113 heterosexual couples) of a published randomized controlled trial. Dyadic mediator models specified either both partners’ self-efficacy as predictors and provided negative partner control to each other as mediators or vice versa. The outcomes comprised both partners’ accelerometer-assessed MVPA. Mediators and outcomes were controlled for their T0 values. Results. The first model showed that women’s and men’s provided negative partner control (T0) was positively related to the other partners’ self-efficacy (T2). Testing the alternative predictive direction, the second model showed that only women’s self-efficacy (T0) was associated with more provided negative partner control (T2) by men. Women and men showed less MVPA (T3) when their partners had provided them with more negative control at T2. Conclusions. As negative control provided to partners may be detrimental to their behaviour change, interventionists should advise couples to avoid it. However, active ingredients of negative control that may benefit recipients’ self-efficacy beliefs should be investigated in future work.
Autor Diana Hilda Hohl
Diana Hilda Hohl
-
, Janina Lüscher
Janina Lüscher
-
, Jan Keller
Jan Keller
-
, Silke Heuse
Silke Heuse
-
, Urte Scholz
Urte Scholz
-
, Aleksandra Łuszczyńska (Filia we Wrocławiu / II Wydział Psychologii we Wrocławiu)
Aleksandra Łuszczyńska
- II Wydział Psychologii we Wrocławiu
, Nina Knoll
Nina Knoll
-
Tytuł czasopisma/seriiBritish Journal of Health Psychology, ISSN 1359-107X, (A 35 pkt)
Rok wydania2018
Nr23
Paginacja580-596
Objętość publikacji w arkuszach wydawniczych0.8
Klasyfikacja ASJC3202 Applied Psychology; 2700 General Medicine
DOIDOI:10.1111/bjhp.12305
Języken angielski
Plik
Inter-relations among_tekst.pdf 516.9 KB
Pliki dodatkowe
Inter-relations_oświadczenie Łuszczyńska.pdf 541.93 KB
Punktacja (całkowita)35
Żródło punktacjijournalList
Wskaźniki publikacji Scopus SNIP (Source Normalised Impact per Paper): 2017 = 1.457; Impact Factor WoS: 2017 = 2.706 (2) - 2017=3.197 (5)
Liczba cytowań*4 (2020-10-19)
Cytuj
Udostępnij Udostępnij

Pobierz odnośnik do tego rekordu


* Podana liczba cytowań wynika z analizy informacji dostępnych w Internecie i jest zbliżona do wartości obliczanej przy pomocy systemu Publish or Perish.
Powrót
Potwierdzenie
Czy jesteś pewien?