Dialogue and labeling. Are these helpful in finding volunteers?

Tomasz Grzyb , Dariusz Doliński , Wojciech Kulesza

Abstract

n/a
Author Tomasz Grzyb (Filia we Wrocławiu / Wydział Psychologii we Wrocławiu)
Tomasz Grzyb,,
- Wydział Psychologii we Wrocławiu
, Dariusz Doliński (Filia we Wrocławiu / Wydział Psychologii we Wrocławiu)
Dariusz Doliński,,
- Wydział Psychologii we Wrocławiu
, Wojciech Kulesza (Wydział Psychologii w Warszawie)
Wojciech Kulesza,,
- Wydział Psychologii w Warszawie
Journal seriesJournal of Social Psychology, ISSN 0022-4545, e-ISSN 1940-1183, (N/A 70 pkt)
Issue year2021
Vol161
No1
Pages63-71
Publication size in sheets0.5
Keywords in original languagedialogue; labelling; charity; voluntarism; social influence
ASJC Classification3207 Social Psychology
Abstract in original languageAmong social influence techniques, a special place is occupied by dialogue involvement – it is not only a means of improving chances for compliance, but it can also perform a synergistic function, reinforcing the workings of other influence techniques. In two field experiments, we explored what effectiveness the technique of dialogue involvement can have in acquiring volunteers (Study 1) and how it functions in combination with the labeling technique (Study 2). The achieved results demonstrate that dialogue involvement not only increases the chance of obtaining agreement to be a volunteer in a day room facility for children or in a pediatric ward of a local hospital, but it also increases the average number of hours that volunteers declare they will work. Dialogue involvement also demonstrates effectiveness in combination with the technique of labeling.
DOIDOI:10.1080/00224545.2020.1758017
URL https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2020.1758017
Languageen angielski
File
Dialogue and labeling Are these helpful in finding volunteers pdf.pdf 1.12 MB
Additional file
osw_Dolinski.pdf 200.27 KB
osw_Grzyb.pdf 182.82 KB
osw_Kulesza.pdf 100.64 KB
Score (nominal)70
Score sourcejournalList
Publication indicators Scopus SNIP (Source Normalised Impact per Paper): 2018 = 0.749; WoS Impact Factor: 2017 = 1.227 (2) - 2017=1.645 (5)
Citation count*
Cite
Share Share

Get link to the record


* presented citation count is obtained through Internet information analysis and it is close to the number calculated by the Publish or Perish system.
Back
Confirmation
Are you sure?