Measurements of Rationality: Individual Differences in Information Processing, the Transitivity of Preferences and Decision Strategies

Patrycja Śleboda , Joanna Sokołowska

Abstract

The first goal of this study was to validate the Rational-Experiential Inventory (REI) and the Cognitive Reflection Test (CRT) through checking their relation to the transitivity axiom. The second goal was to test the relation between decision strategies and cognitive style as well as the relation between decision strategies and the transitivity of preferences. The following characteristics of strategies were investigated: requirements for trade-offs, maximization vs. satisficing and option-wise vs. attribute-wise information processing. Respondents were given choices between two multi-attribute options. The options were designed so that the choice indicated which strategy was applied. Both the REI-R and the CRT were found to be good predictors of the transitivity of preferences. Respondents who applied compensatory strategies and the maximization criterion scored highly on the REI-R and in the CRT, whereas those who applied the satisficing rule scored highly on the REI-R but not in the CRT. Attribute-wise information processing was related to low scores in both measurements. Option-wise information processing led to a high transitivity of preferences.
Author Patrycja Śleboda (Wydział Psychologii)
Patrycja Śleboda,,
- Wydział Psychologii
, Joanna Sokołowska (Wydział Psychologii)
Joanna Sokołowska,,
- Wydział Psychologii
Journal seriesFrontiers in Psychology, ISSN 1664-1078, (A 35 pkt)
Issue year2017
Vol8
Pages1-12
Publication size in sheets0.55
ASJC Classification3200 General Psychology
DOIDOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01844
URL https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01844
Languageen angielski
File
Sleboda, Sokolowska, 2017.pdf 847.61 KB
Additional file
oswiadczenie SWPS.pdf 24.12 KB
Publikacje punktowane Oświadczenie2.pdf 163.16 KB
Score (nominal)35
Score sourcejournalList
Publication indicators Scopus SNIP (Source Normalised Impact per Paper): 2016 = 1.006; WoS Impact Factor: 2017 = 2.089 (2) - 2017=2.749 (5)
Citation count*5 (2020-11-30)
Cite
Share Share

Get link to the record


* presented citation count is obtained through Internet information analysis and it is close to the number calculated by the Publish or Perish system.
Back
Confirmation
Are you sure?