When is a lie more of a lie? Moral judgment mediates the relationship between perceived benefits of others and lie-labeling

Katarzyna Cantarero , Piotr Szarota

Abstract

Lay perceptions of lying are argued to consist of a lie prototype. The latter was found to entail the intention to deceive, belief in falsity and falsity (Coleman & Kay, 1981). We proposed and found that the perceptions of the benefits of others are also an important factor that influences the extent, to which an act of intentional misleading someone to foster a false belief is labeled as a lie. Drawing from the intuitionist model of moral judgments (Haidt, 2001) we assumed that moral judgment of the behaviour would mediate the relationship. In Study 1 we analyzed data coming from a crosscultural project and found that perceived intention to benefit others was negatively related to lie labeling and that this relationship was mediated by the moral judgment of that act. In Study 2 we found that manipulating the benefits of others influenced the extent, to which an act of intentional misleading in order to foster a false belief is labeled as a lie and that, again, this relationship is mediated by the moral judgment of that act.
Author Katarzyna Cantarero (Wydział Zamiejscowy w Sopocie)
Katarzyna Cantarero,,
- Wydział Zamiejscowy w Sopocie
, Piotr Szarota
Piotr Szarota,,
-
Journal seriesPolish Psychological Bulletin, ISSN 0079-2993, e-ISSN 1641-7844, (B 15 pkt)
Issue year2017
Vol48
No2
Pages315-325
Publication size in sheets0.5
Keywords in Englishprototype, lying, egoistic, other-oriented, lay definition, deception
ASJC Classification3200 General Psychology
DOIDOI:10.1515/ppb-2017-0036
URL https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318054780_When_is_a_lie_more_of_a_lie_Moral_judgment_mediates_the_relationship_between_perceived_benefits_of_others_and_lie-labeling
Languageen angielski
File
Cantarero afiliacja When is a lie more.pdf 46.44 KB
Cantarero Text When_is_a_lie.pdf 400.32 KB
Score (nominal)15
Score sourcejournalList
Publication indicators Scopus SNIP (Source Normalised Impact per Paper): 2017 = 0.232
Citation count*5 (2020-10-27)
Cite
Share Share

Get link to the record


* presented citation count is obtained through Internet information analysis and it is close to the number calculated by the Publish or Perish system.
Back
Confirmation
Are you sure?